Video passage monitoring
For sites where cameras can see clearly, Ark CV adapts to the equipment and footage already in place, then builds dependable passage outputs around the questions your team needs answered.
Assess video footage ↗
Fish monitoring built for the real world
Fish don’t wait for clear water or convenient hours. Ark CV helps fisheries teams monitor passage around the clock—adapting to the cameras, sensors, and footage already available on site.
Monitoring solutions
For sites where cameras can see clearly, Ark CV adapts to the equipment and footage already in place, then builds dependable passage outputs around the questions your team needs answered.
Assess video footage ↗When the water is too dark or turbid for a camera, acoustic imagery offers another way to observe passage. We start with your site, equipment, and footage to determine what a validated, reviewable solution can support.
Assess acoustic feasibility ↗Site-validated result
At Wells Dam, Ark CV agreed with human counts 98.7% of the time during peak sockeye migration—across more than 32,000 fish.
Read the Wells validation study →Result scope: Wells Dam, peak sockeye migration, comparison with official human counts using raw model outputs before QA correction.
One operational loop
We start with the cameras, sensors, and footage already available at your passageway.
→We adapt the system to your site and bring likely passage events to the surface, so your team does not have to hunt through hours of footage.
→A human-in-the-loop review process can be tailored to your team, your questions, and the level of review each decision requires.
→Use near-real-time outputs in the format you need—exported for analysis or built directly into your existing databases.
→Frequently asked questions
Usually, no. We begin with the cameras, acoustic systems, footage, and infrastructure already available, then assess what can be supported reliably at your site.
Outputs are designed around the questions your team needs answered. Depending on the site and validation scope, that can include passage counts, direction, species, size, adipose-fin detection, injury monitoring, review clips, or reporting fields specific to your program.
That depends on the sensor, site conditions, species, and available training data. We begin with a feasibility assessment and define capabilities only after working with representative footage from your passageway.
Ark CV flags cases where the system may be struggling and routes them through a configurable quality-assurance process. Those QA clips actively strengthen the training dataset so the system can handle similar conditions automatically in the future.
Human-in-the-loop review is adapted to the needs and risk profile of each site. Reviewers can focus on flagged cases and the events they choose without having to rewatch every hour of footage.
Reporting can be delivered in near real time. Results can be exported for analysis or built directly into a customer’s existing databases and reporting workflows.
We treat site imagery and monitoring data as sensitive customer information and keep it secure throughout processing, review, and delivery. Specific data-handling requirements can be incorporated into each deployment.
Start by sharing representative footage, your existing equipment, and the monitoring questions you need answered. We’ll assess feasibility and outline a practical validation path.
Every passageway is different. Ark CV builds from the equipment you already have, adapts the analysis and human-review process to your needs, and validates the resulting system at your site. Our proven video work provides the foundation; acoustic imagery expands where that approach can go.
Start with your footage
Share the footage, equipment, and monitoring questions you have today. We’ll assess feasibility and outline a practical path toward a site-validated system.